Concurrent validity of clinical balance tests for older adults with cognitive impairment

Authors

  • Normala Mesbah Physiotherapy Programme and Center for Healthy Ageing and Wellness, Faculty of Health Sciences, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Meredith Perry Centre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
  • Keith D. Hill Rehabilitation Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
  • Donald Manlapaz Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Philippines
  • Leigh Hale Centre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15619/nzjp.v51i3.277

Keywords:

Balance, Cognitive Impairment, Concurrent Validity, Falls Risk, Older Adults, Postural Stability

Abstract

Older adults with cognitive impairment frequently have reduced balance and are at high risk for falling.  We investigated the concurrent validity of the Physiological Profile Assessment (PPA) and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test with computerised posturography in 13 older adults (mean (SD) age 80 (8) years) with mild-to-moderate cognitive impairment (mean (SD) Mini-Mental State Examination score, 19 (9)). Spearman’s rho demonstrated: moderately good positive correlation between  PPA (muscle strength) and posturography rising index (rs = 0.699, p = 0.01) and posturography mediolateral sway during eyes open standing on a foam surface (rs = 0.604, p = 0.04); good negative correlations between PPA anteroposterior sway (eyes closed) and posturography sway velocity (eyes open) standing on foam (rs = –0.745, p = 0.01) and Romberg ratios of PPA and posturography (rs = –0.698, p = 0.02); moderately good positive correlations between TUG and posturography (left step quick turn time; left turn sway; rs = 0.548, p = 0.04; 0.646, p = 0.02) and good-to-excellent negative correlation between TUG and posturography (rising index rs = –0.719, p = 0.01). Both tests appear valid measures of balance in older adults with mild-to-moderate cognitive impairment; however, we suggest both are used.

Downloads

Published

28-11-2023

How to Cite

Mesbah, N., Perry, M., Hill, K. D., Manlapaz, D., & Hale, L. (2023). Concurrent validity of clinical balance tests for older adults with cognitive impairment. New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy, 51(3), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.15619/nzjp.v51i3.277

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>