What are possible reasons for the different choices of low back pain healthcare between European, Māori, and Pasifika for services funded by the Accident Compensation Corporation?

Authors

  • Nicola Saywell Physiotherapy Department, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology; Rehabilitation Innovation Centre, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
  • Jacob Gordon Auckland, New Zealand; Tribal affiliation: Ngāti Raukawa and Ngāti Maniapoto
  • Thomas Adams Physiotherapy Department, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology; Active Living and Rehabilitation: Aotearoa New Zealand, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
  • Imran Niazi Physiotherapy Department, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology; Rehabilitation Innovation Centre, Auckland University of Technology; Centre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland, New Zealand
  • Julia Hill Physiotherapy Department, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology; Active Living and Rehabilitation: Aotearoa New Zealand, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15619/nzjp.v52i3.458

Keywords:

Accident Compensation Corporation, Healthcare, Low Back Pain, Māori, Pasifika

Abstract

Aotearoa New Zealand has a unique funding model in the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC), for those who have an injury. The ACC funds a range of healthcare practitioners to treat low back pain from accidental causes and the costs continue to rise. However, there are clear ethnic differences in the services accessed. Data were obtained from ACC and analysed to observe trends in the number of claims and the cost per claim over an 11-year period. The three key findings were: (a) Māori and Pasifika have a lower number of claims than their European counterparts, proportional to population; (b) Māori have fewer claims, but a higher cost per claim than other ethnic groups; and (c) Māori and Pasifika use GP services most frequently, whereas Europeans use physiotherapy. Several factors are potential drivers of these differences, including cost of services leading to delay in seeking help, lack of culturally appropriate information about services, lack of culturally appropriate services, and disproportionately low numbers of Māori and Pasifika in the healthcare workforce. Possible solutions include earlier referral for physiotherapy, building connections with patients, and embracing principles of health models, Te Whare Tapa Whā (Māori) and Fonofale (Pasifika) (which describe the essential elements for health: spiritual, physical, mental and emotional, family, and social).

Downloads

Published

03-12-2024

How to Cite

Saywell, N., Gordon, J., Adams, T., Niazi, I., & Hill, J. (2024). What are possible reasons for the different choices of low back pain healthcare between European, Māori, and Pasifika for services funded by the Accident Compensation Corporation?. New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy, 52(3), 250–256. https://doi.org/10.15619/nzjp.v52i3.458

Issue

Section

Scholarly Paper: Clinical or Professional Perspective